Friday, May 25, 2007

Nazism as Jihadism, and vice versa

Nazism was the first encounter of Jihadism for modern Europeans. This is why I prefer to call Islam: Arabic Nazism. Calling it Arabic Nazism is a way to translate it into Western language, making it comprehensible to Westerners in a word they already understand. Both Lawrence Auster and Ali Sina describe Mohammad as a successful Hitler. Ali Sina adds that Mohammad was worse than Hitler, since Hitler was not a sexual pervert (pedophile etc.).

Now some quotes of great thinkers who understood well the true character of Islam. First Winston Churchill (1948):

Hitler’s sentence was reduced from four years to thirteen months. These months in the Landsberg fortress were however, sufficient to enable him to complete in outline Mein Kampf, a treatise on his political philosophy inscribed to the dead of the recent Putsch. When eventually he came to power, there was no book which deserved more careful study from the rulers, political and military, of the Allied Powers. All was there—the programme of German resurrection; the technique of party propaganda; the plan for combating Marxism; the concept of a National-Socialist State; the right position of Germany at the summit of the world. Here was the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message.
(hat tip: Uriasposten)
Then Karl Jung (1939):
We do not know whether Hitler is going to found a new Islam. (He is already on the way; he is like Mohammad. The emotion in Germany is Islamic; warlike and Islamic. They are all drunk with wild god). That can be the historic future.
(hat tip: Andrew Bostom)
Finally Hilter himself, while persuading his associates that a Jewish holocaust would be tolerated by the West:
Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?
He was of course correct about this. His mistake was in trying to conquer all of Europe. Had he only settled for conquering Poland, Austria and a little more, while gassing all the Jews to death, nobody would have reacted. Which is shown today in how nobody cares about the genocides in Rwanda and Sudan (no not Darfur, the millions killed before that). Or Bangladesh in 1973.

All these genocides committed by Jihadists: Arabic or European Nazis. I.e. by Islam or the European Islam-clone.


Update:
Søren Krarup of the Danish People's Party compared the Koran with Main Kampf, this week in the Danish parliament:
The Koran here corresponds to Karl Marx' Das Kapital or Hitler's Mein Kampf. It's the holy book aiming at dominating everything. It's the totalitarianism.
Mogens Rukov wrote about the same thing today in Beringske Tidene. He points out that those who are horrified by Krarup's comparison, react so because they haven't read the Koran. And that it took him no more than a morning session, back in the '80s--browsing through the Koran, looking up the word Jews in the index, reading those pages--to find out its Nazi character.

(Both links in Danish)

1 comment:

Lauri Olavi said...

Can we not critisise islam and muslims' present behaviour in its own terms, instead of playing that old Hitler card on them? To compare Mohammed and Hitler is an anachronism of the worst sort anyway. Both were specific procucts of their hugely different environments and epochs.